When you are interested in physics you must read “Unbelievable”!

The above analyses give the unique possibility to eliminate Planck’s constant h as an independent natural constant.

The formula for the Planck-distance is:

(12)

The classical radius or Compton – radius of the electron is:

(13)

We showed that the ratio between the Planck-radius and the classical radius of the electron is .

(14)

The theoretical value for Planck’s (14) constant is h= 6.648982×10^−34 [Js] while the empirical measured value is h= 6.626069×10^−34 [Js].

The theoretical derived constant of Planck is a factor 1.003458 times the empirical value. The discrepancy is therefore just 0.35%. Scientists claim that this formula for Planck’s constant is merely a numerical approximation, not exact and therefore the formula is false!

When you are interested in physics you must read “Unbelievable“!

The above analyses give the unique possibility to eliminate Planck’s constant h as an independent natural constant.

The formula for the Planck-distance is:

(12)

The classical radius or Compton–radius of the electron is:

(13)

We showed that the ratio between the Planck-radius and the classical radius of the electron is .

(14)

The theoretical value for Planck’s (14) constant is h= 6.648982*10^-34 [Js] while the empirical measured value is h= 6.626069*10^-34 [Js].

The theoretical derived constant of Planck is a factor 1.003458 times the empirical value. The discrepancy is therefore just 0.35%. Scientists claim that this formula for Planck’s constant is merely a numerical approximation, not exact and therefore the formula is false!